Online Pharmacy
Pain Killers
soma carisoprodol
Relaxer drugs
viagra online australia
Levitra Cialis Viagra
Cialis comparison levitra
cordarone online online detrol female viagra online order levitra au online cipro online nolvadex online toprol order aciphex online order rx online online rx store naprosyn online vasotec online Muscle Relaxant. Pain Relief. Drugstore protonix drug micardis drug brahmi drug adalat drug altace drug amaryl drug casodex drug celebrex drug cephalexin drug confido drug danasol drug effexor drug lasix drug citotec drug altace drug omnicef drug prozac drug flomax drug aciphex drug zelnorm drug mobic drug levaquin drug atacand drug coreg drug

links for 2006-09-20

Comments

  1. Stephanie B. wrote:

    Thanks for publishing the story. To be honest, media, academia, and society are working together to get the twisted view out to the American public, warning them of the dangers of interracial relationships and multiracial children. The oft phrase,”what about the children?” ratifies the fear Americans have toward multiracials. It’s a way to put multiracials, especially those of black/nonblack ancestries, “in their place” so as not to disturb the white American power structure as they have done(and still do) with People of Color.

    Stephanie

    Stephanie’s Journal at:

    http://httpjournalsaolcomjenjer6steph.blogspot.com/

  2. IkoIko wrote:

    I’m curious why a number of key items were played up on the blog post to the exclusion of others…

    The University of Chicago Magazine is not an academic journal, but merely a standard university PR vehicle to highlighting the work of faculty, students, etc. So the level of detail about the work in question would be different.

    Dr. Yoonsun Choi, the academic with whom issue is taken, is an assistant professor at the School of Social Service Administration at the University of Chicago, who also is a faculty member at the university’s interdisciplinary Center for the Study of Race, Politics and Culture (the former affiliation was mentioned in the actual U.Chicago article, the latter was not).

    The work in question was an analysis of a 1997 federal survey of 2,082 Seattle middle-school students published this past spring in the American Journal of Orthopsychiatry.

    The original survey was aimed at improving minority-youth health. 20% of the respondents self-identified as multiracials, and were asked to candidly self-report about a number of problem-related helath behaviors in lower-income neighborhoods.

    So given the timeframe, that means all this data collected under the Clinton Administration. Dr. Choi’s analysis of the 20% multiracial subset, therefore was not an actual study, merely a review of the numbers for patterns from the responses.

    Dr. Choi herself clearly states in the magazine piece that she “had yet to decipher all the factors that exacerbate multiracial youths’ ‘bad outcomes’. Again not things that make them bad because they are multiracial, but the factors that are more likely to correlate because they are multiracial youth. That’s where any study actually kicks in.

    That no commentary bothered to pick up her three thoughts on the impact of the problem from the study, would seem to suggest an agenda in an of itself.

    Dr. Choi clearly stated her view towards the end of the same article that:

    (1) racial discrimination by other ethnic groups is part of the hurdle multiracials face

    (2) with kids being prone to act out in response to ridicule or ostracism, other kids will push others out if the encounter others of any racial combination. She however compared findings from similar surveys in Hawaii with multiracial youth, noting that there were not more problems than monoracial classmates. That key difference she attributed to:

    (3) strong ethnic identity, racial or cultural pride providing a sense of belonging and in turn confidence that protects kids from destructive behavior

    The intriguing, though controversial afterthought and implication Dr. Choi hints at– again left untouched– is how does one orient towards an identity that provides favorable grounding however mixed you are while navigating the reality that the assimilation happens pretty rapidly.

    So yeah, it’s “yet another academic study about multiracials”. But at a time when good data, solid research, and clear messages are underscoring how complex the issues are and what’s needed to support youth as they assert their identity however they choose to– is it not more of a disservice to dismiss the people trying to do more than simply raise the issues, before actually reviewing and processing what’s said on its worth and merits by not even framing the work in full?

    (No affiliation with U.Chicago in any way shape or form…)

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.