Viacom doesn’t care about black people

CVK
Viacom, the parent company that owns MTV, VH1, BET and many other media holdings, is doing a piss-poor job when it comes to media representations of black men and women. Judging by what we’ve seen over the last few weeks, Viacom seems pretty enthusiastic about furthering stereotypes of black men as inherently criminal and violent, and black women as sub-human, oversexed beasts.

First, Flava Flav’s reality show came back for its second season on VH1 on August 6th. According to TVGuide.com, the “premiere of Flavor of Love 2 earned VH1 its biggest season-premiere audience ever: 3.3 million viewers.” The show is already a hot ass mess on a regular day. But the premiere episode took it to a whole new level. One of the contestants, apparently suffering from uncontrollable diarrohea, squatted down in her evening dress during the “clock ceremony” and defecated on the floor.

(For more on Flava Flav’s descent into utter buffoonery, check out these great posts from Nate On The Mic and Return of the Brown-Eyed Girl.)

snoopThen, MTV2 came under attack for its new animated series “Where My Dogs At?” (Thanks to Gigi and Kimberly for the tips.) Yahoo! News summarizes the episode which, by the way, aired on a Saturday afternoon - primetime viewing for children and teens:

In it, a look-alike of rap star Snoop Dogg strolls into a pet shop with two bikini-clad black women on leashes. They hunch over on all fours and scratch themselves as he orders one of them to “hand me my latte.” At the end of the segment, the Snoopathon Dogg Esquire character dons a rubber glove to clean up excrement left on the floor by one of the women.

MTV President Christina Norman — who is a black woman — dismissed the criticisms, claiming that the episode was “social satire” and “in fact a parody of an actual appearance Snoop Dogg made where he was accompanied by two women wearing neck collars and chains… We certainly do not condone Snoop’s actions and the goal was to take aim at that incident for its insensitivity and outrageousness.” More after the jump…

Somehow I have a feeling that all the twelve year-olds watching this episode were not thinking to themselves, “well clearly they’re referencing Snoop’s August 28, 2003 arrival at the MTV Video Music Awards and lambasting him for his misogyny.” :|

Then today, I read this SOHH.com summary of BET’s fall line-up. The two big new shows they’re debuting? One is called “Beef” which is all about documenting celebrity feuds (Kobe vs. Shaq! Bill O’Reilly vs. Ludacris! Bow Wow vs. Romeo!). The other is called “American Gangster” and will…

retell the life stories of infamous figures like Stanley “Tookie” Williams, Leroy “Nicky” Barnes, “Freeway Ricky” Ross and the Chambers Brothers. Airing on Wednesdays at 9pm EST/PST this ground-breaking series will peer into the lives of some of Black America’s most notorious figures and their impact on society and their communities

So basically, BET is celebrating violence and criminalism in the black community. Real classy.

It’s too bad because lately BET had actually been giving me hope. Jeff Johnson has helmed a couple shows that attempted to throw some social commentary into the mix. “The Cousin Jeff Chronicles” is or was (not sure if it’s still on) a news magazine-style show that covered issues ranging from the gap between the hip hop generation and the civil rights generation, to obesity in the black community, to sex in hip hop, etc. And “The Wrap-Up” “The Chop Up” is a pretty innovative show that delivers quick hits of important news, combined with commentary and rants from various people in the community.

Of course, it’s far too simplistic to make this just about “The Man” perpetuating negative stereotypes about black people. It’s important to question how and why black people themselves are involved in creating this media and supporting its existence by tuning in to boost its ratings.

“Where My Dogs At?” is voiced by comedians Tracy Morgan and Jeffrey Ross. “Flavor of Love” of course, has a black man as its star, and many black woman among the contestants. And I would guess that there are plenty of black folks involved in creating BET’s new shows “Beef” and “American Gangster.” And perhaps most importantly, there are lots of black viewers consuming this media. And if there’s a demand, there will be a supply.

I leave you with snippets from two really great bloggers. First, Kim Pearson:

So this raises a question about the women who originally allowed Snoop to parade them around. Were they perpetuating oppressive stereotypes, or having fun? Are they at fault for helping to create the image on which the cartoon was based. What about Snoop Dogg’s responsibility as a black man? And as a black woman, should the president of MTV’s stance have been different?

And finally, LynnLinn:

…this whole notion of feces and black women appearing within the same context of do do, is beyond crass, bordering on evil, and indicates a whole new low in the construct of the “black bitch out of control” stereotype. Now the media posits that the black woman’s body is so out of control that she chooses not to go to the bathroom, preferring to shit on herself or in her own space (an indication of an infantile mentality or an animal that has no respect for itself). This lack of self control points to the need to beat her, take her out to the country and leave her in a field, or euthanize her for her own good. Furthermore, her body stinks up the place, and should she be kept at home, chained and locked away from the rest of society–invisible…

…What I find most appalling (besides MTV’s lame excuse for the creation of the cartoon) is Christina Norman’s defense of this poop. This just demonstrates that people will do anything for money including kicking their own asses. The bottom line is that whether she knows it or not, she is the one “socially” associated with the image of the defecating out of control black female and Viacom will take her to the country and leave her with the first wrong move, including supporting crap (again, no pun intended) if it suddenly becomes unpopular. Perhaps this is why she is playing the Condoleeza Rice role, shuffling down the corridors of Viacom, happy to accomodate all those “high powered” execs, in whatever manner they choose, including support of this cartoon…

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Really Really Good-The Weekender « Canhead on 25 Aug 2006 at 3:20 pm

    […] Mixed Media Watch has a piece up called Viacom Doesnt Care About Black People. In it they call out the MTV, VH1 parent copany on the way they depict black people. check it out, if for nothing more that the classic shot of Flav’s grin. […]

Comments

  1. eric wrote:

    theres not much else that can be said… :/

  2. Merq wrote:

    Precisely.
    Post-Katrina, Condi was on major damage-control duty, and this is no different.

    The only thing I’m questioning is your “what about Snoop” query. Haven’t you been paying attention over the last 5-10 years? Snoops a fuckin’ caricature of his former self! Scratch that. He’s a caricature, period.

    Sadly enough, he’s talented. But the fact is he’s a male Paris Hilton who will NEVER let himself consider the consequences of his actions.

    This is the man who made (and repeatedly defended) “Soul Plane,” for shit’s sake. Nothing he does should surprise you.

  3. John wrote:

    I think your headline is very misleading. Why not place the blame where it belongs … on the men and women who create and/or star in these types of programs? Why not blame Snoop Dogg rather than Viacom? Or Flava Flav rather than Viacom?

    Isn’t BET run by all African-Americans? Why doesn’t someone there have better sense?

    This isn’t about Viacom at all, and it certainly isn’t about the Man. This is about the poor judgment of the black entertainers and producers involved in creating such vile “entertainment.”

  4. Merq wrote:

    “Isn’t BET run by all African-Americans?”

    In one word? No.

    I don’t know if I’m wasting my time talking to you here (after all, your comment on “the Man” leads me to suspect I shouldn’t bother) but the fact remains that any assumption that BET (or VIBE magazine or any entity purportedly creating “black-oriented content”) is run completely by blacks is totally erroneous.

    So no, John. Carmen & Jen aren’t victimizing the poor, defenseless white man here.

  5. Ed wrote:

    I’m going to reserve judgement on BET show American Gangster. This may actually be a great show, better than that Gates stuff on PBS if it is done right. Some of the people they are going to profile are very exceptional people who have made an impact on the Black community, whether the bougie middle class like to hear it or not.

    Viacom and the rest of these media bigots are in their last throes. Distribution of media in less than 26 months will shift to the Internet and on demand programming and they are desperate as right now.

    Why are all my girls better looking than these celebrities groupies? Is it my personality?

  6. eric wrote:

    whoa whoa whoa merq, you’re blowing my mind here, next you’re going to say that the music industry isn’t run by black people, and that eminem and justin timberlake are being judged solely on their talent!!!

    :)

  7. Merq wrote:

    I’m sorry, Eric. I know it’s the hardest truth to swallow next to the assertions that:
    -Santa and the Tooth Fairy are bogus
    -Pro-wrestling isn’t real

    Dude, I understand. I’ve been there.

  8. brad wrote:

    Viacom owns MTV, VH1 and BET. Yes, the individual performers own their fair share of guilt, but so do the network heads who program this crap. They all know it’s crap but don’t care because it sells.

    Flava Flav and his show are horrible representations of what’s wrong with sellouts and corporate plantation owners. In the 1950s, the NAACP organized a boycott of CBS because of the Amos & Andy show. I’m not for censorship, but there is something be said for a maligned group protesting its slandered image.

    Snoop, Flava Flav and their compatriots are all millionaires. They don’t have any excuses for desperate acts to feed their families.

  9. Adrianna wrote:

    Everytime i see promos for these show I get nauseaous, So i avoid it like the plage. I do beleive that both the artist and Viacom are to blame for the crap put om TV. That is why we need a media revolution I’m going to start what about you ?

  10. John wrote:

    What do you mean when you say BET isn’t run by African-Americans? Debra Lee isn’t African-American? Reginald Hudlin isn’t African-American?

    It’s true that BET is now owned by a corporate entity but that doesn’t absolve the network — or the entertainers it employs — from responsibility. Same with MTV and Christina Norman.

    And I used the term “the Man” because CVK did.

    Further, the original post stated:

    “… Viacom seems pretty enthusiastic about furthering stereotypes of black men as inherently criminal and violent, and black women as sub-human, oversexed beasts.”

    In my opinion, that is extremely inflammatory language — especially when the two networks criticized are led by African-Americans and the shows that are criticized star African-Americans.

    So it is Viacom that is enthusiastic, not individuals such as Ms. Lee, Mr. Hudlin, Ms. Norman? Even though they are directly responsible for the fare they green-light on their networks?

  11. Merq wrote:

    Right, John. There’s only one solution. Sue Carmen for accusing the white-run Viacom corporation and the black artists, but forgetting the middle stage: the black figureheads.

    Debra Lee and Reginald Hudlin are black. True. However, I’m glad you’re already aware that Christina Norman is black as well, but I’m sure not even you would dare call MTV “run by an african american.”

  12. site admin wrote:

    Hey John and Merq, maybe it wasn’t clear in my post, but the point I was trying to make is that you can’t lay the blame on one party only. The people who run the networks are a part of it, the entertainers are a part of it, but the audience is a part of it too. If you’re tuning into “Flavor of Love,” you’re giving them ratings, which makes them think this is what people want to watch, and they’ll just produce more crap like this.

    John, I specifically said (caps for emphasis):

    “IT’S FAR TOO SIMPLISTIC to make this just about “The Man” perpetuating negative stereotypes about black people.”

    So no, I’m not laying the blame for all of it on Viacom. This is a complex issue where everyone plays a part. –CVK

  13. eric wrote:

    John,

    In order to answer your questions, I have some suggestions.

    -TV-

    Look at the current programming on the BFC (Black Family Channel) Look at the programming that was on BET when it first came out. Look at the programming for TVone (to a lesser extent)

    Compare this to what the major networks push out and support as black comedies (I’d have said TV shows, but that would include dramas, of which there are none :))

    - FILM -
    Search online for African and African-American film festivals, and read what kind of movies are getting made for a black audience. Now contrast this with what actually makes a major release in the US.

    Again, you’re going to see this dichotomy between black programming FOR blacks having a wide spectrum of topics, in various comedic AND dramatic formats. Whereas black programming for the masses via major media outlets will streamline what gets showed into things like “Phat Girls” and “White Chicks”.

    - MUSIC -

    This one is REAL simple, just go find some old r&b charts from the 80s, back when r&b was the “black” chart, and pop was the “white” chart.

    Again, you’re going to find a wide range of music represented on that list, everything from Anita Baker/Jeffrey Osborne/Luther to ATCQ/De La/Jungle Bros to Bobby Brown/Guy/Toni Tony Tone to Scarface/NWA/Too Short. Since these albums/radio stations were considered secondary income by the labels, there was tolerance for a wide range of music.

    Now that Pop music IS black music, look at todays artists, its a very streamlined look and sound.

    These are just some very easy examples from current day and recent history, I hope this helps to illustrate some of the points being made here.

    Its easy to sluff all the blame on the performers (and believe me, I do give them their fair share), but the reality is there are legions of black performers who want to do interesting and diverse work in all aspects of media, but there is no outlet for them because the major media companies will not take a chance to push and promote it properly. If your assertions were correct. the wide and diverse array of media representations being put out there by blacks for blacks on a grassroots level (film festivals, startup networks , underground radio) would not exist.

    -Eric

  14. Ajax wrote:

    As long as crap like that sells, people will always do that type of stupid shit.

  15. John wrote:

    Merq … at what point does an African-American leader stop being a figurehead and start taking responsibility for the organization he/she leads? In my opinion, you are diminishing the accomplishments of people who have reached a pinnacle of their profession by labeling them as mere figureheads — unable to make decisions on their own.

    Do you have some proof that the “white people” at Viacom dictate what BET should or shouldn’t air? Your argument is specious, especially considering that BET often came under criticism for its programming — from African-Americans — before it was sold to Viacom.

    If it is true that BET and MTV — under African-American leadership — are being forced to air racially insensitive programming by the white bosses at Viacom against their wishes and judgment, then I would expect those individuals to stand up and protest. the fact that they defend their choices says to me that they are okay with what airs, as long as it gets rating.

    And that leads me to this final point: The problem here is not one of white media versus black media. Ajax said it best … as long as people buy/watch drivel, entertainment companies will create it. And so will African-American entertainers, who are no better or nor worse than their white counterparts when it comes to chasing the dollar.

  16. John wrote:

    Sorry … I said final point, but I left something out.

    Viacom also owns Comedy Central, which airs Blue Collar TV, and CMT, which airs Country Fried Videos.

    Those programs portray rural white Southerners in a bad light and perpetuate negative stereotypes that have existed for decades. Does that mean that Viacom doesn’t care about white Southerners?

    You may say that “there’s a difference” but I would argue once again that it’s about what sells. Jeff Foxworthy and Flava Flav couldn’t be further apart culturally, but they are united by the desire to be on television and make money, no matter what they have to say or do to accomplish that.

  17. mtevc wrote:

    blame goes both ways…but overall, i find that the younger crowd (white and black)…maybe under the ages of 30 or so, are much more accepting of trash, demeaning tv shows, immoral role models spewed at them from TV and music…

    flavor flav is merely the 21st century step n fetchit, except he has no excuse as step did (consideing step’s era)

  18. Merq wrote:

    John,

    I believe Eric has done a far better job than I ever could in explaining this to you, as I don’t pretend to be a patient man. That said, I will make an attempt.

    It seems Carmen may have misunderstood my point, or she wouldn’t have included me in her comments to you. If you click on my name, you’ll be directed to a web-documentary in which I unequivocally state that not only are the corporations to blame, but so are the artists and their audiences.

    As far as Norman, Lee, etc go… I am not calling them “mere figureheads” because they’re puppets for some evil white power structure. That’s that “white men are the real victims” mentality emerging again. The fact is, with every network, the parent company controls the stake of its subsidiaries– whether they are headed by blacks, whites, Asians, or Michael Jackson. The fact remains that, for teenybopper audiences and the 21-34 “it’s not racist, it’s ironic” demographic, such minstrelsy sells like hell. Thus, even if Hudlin (who, interestingly enough, was Aaron McGruder’s writing partner back when he engaged in responsible racial satire) decided he wanted to push programming with greater depth but less flash, chances are the higher-ups would be less-than-inclined to oblige him.

    (Of course, nobody mentions the fact that maybe some of these more meaningful projects would be more successful if they were actually PROMOTED as much as the bling, bitches, and booty.)

    I’m not accusing Viacom execs of wanting to destroy the black population. Their main concern is turning a profit, and intellectual content isn’t particularly profitable these days.

    The problem is that when these things get said, people like you are far too quick to cry victim.

    There. I hope that clarifies things… but just in case you’re still fuzzy:

    VIACOM is to blame
    The black network exec is to blame
    The irresponsible entertainer is to blame
    The sellout pseudo-satirist is to blame
    The lobotomized viewer is to blame
    THE WHOLE DAMN SYSTEM IS OUT OF ORDER!!!

    Clearer now?

  19. John wrote:

    Merq … I’m not claiming that white men are victims. Never wrote that. Never implied that. That’s a strawman that just doesn’t hold water.

    You and Eric don’t need to “explain” things to me. I’m not “fuzzy” or unclear … in fact, I see perfectly what the situation is. I simply felt that the headline of this original post was misleading.

    In fact, I wrote pretty much what you did … that this is all about money, and people of all colors will do crazy stuff to make the almight dollar.

  20. Merq wrote:

    Actually, John, the headline is right on point (besides the fact that it was obviously a pop-culture reference you may have chosen to ignore). While Viacom may not HATE black people, their willingness to air this shows they certainly don’t care about them.

  21. JQ wrote:

    Merq….
    I think that your comments are soooo on point…responsibility is across the board. these folks need to MAN UP as Lisa from Industry Ears said…Its amazing to me that people dont understand that the people in power are the ones that drive the machine…and not the black face on the frontline…

  22. brad wrote:

    Of course the black network leaders deserve their share of blame. Hell, BET was putting out racist stereotypical crap when it was owned by Robert Johnson 4 or 5 years ago. What is different about BET today is that all pretense of providing hard news has been eliminated. There are no more Tavis Smileys. The only type of news programs are exploitational documentaries about the “Down Low.”

    Where are the investigative reports or analysis of life for African-Americans?

  23. mtevc wrote:

    okay guys…email a friend and tell them to get on the ed gordon and tavis smiley bandwagon then

  24. mwarren wrote:

    You know John, I somewhat agree with you in stating the headline is misleading in that they are placing the blame on Viacom and that the blame should be placed on the black entertainers. Yes- but it is both. If the Viacom guru’s did not buy into this and back it financially, then folks like Snoop Dog, Flava Flav would not be able to be nationally exploited. Yes, it is their choice to be defamed. What I don’t understand it that now that they have enough money to form their ‘own’ production studios- why can’t they do something educationally positive? You know why? Because they have not been exposed to a positive black culture. Experts like Viacom and other stuidos make sure of that. And no John, BET is no longer owned and ran by blacks. The black owner sold it to a white owner who approves of all the negative slander against blacks. The white owner just put a black woman in charge of it, so when we complain, he can point to her. When the Cosby show aired, a show that demonstrated that yes, there could be a black doctor and a black lawyer in the same family, and even married to each other, and their children be studious and intelligent. But what happened to that show? It was cancelled because we were told ‘it is not realistic for a black family to have doctors and lawyers in it, a black mother and a black father’ Who told us that? The same folks who back shows like Flava Flav and Snoop Dog. It is the American culture to make sure that since we cannot be physically enslaved with shackles anymore, however white producers can enslave minorities in their mind. Make them feel and do less than. Do you see how black women are portrayed in movies, sitcoms, and even computerized cartoons (Ant Bully) Fat, black, loud, boisterous, attitudinal. While the white female is portrayed delicate, pure, dense, blonde, appealing (Paris Hilton and the like). For instance, Grey’s anatomy…all the white women are thin, smart, appealing, while the one and only black female is SHORT, FAT, LOUD, AND WITH AN ATTITUDE. Not appealing at all. And to top it off, the black male doctors do not have any interest in black females. gee, I wonder why? You have the head Chief interested in some ol’ white broad that is mental, the other head black doctor interested in an unsanitary, spits in the kitchen sink, doesn’t wash her clothes, nasty, Asian woman, and yes, there is a Latina, but she is also FAT, has no shame and urinates in front of the white thin women, running around chasing after a white male whimp. What are you teaching our black children? That we black women are not worth anything. That our black men have to chase after ‘less than’ white women? This is mental genocide.

  25. mwarren wrote:

    John, to answer your question of ‘do you have some proof that the “white people” at Viacom dictate what BET should or shouldn’t air?”, uh, the answer is yes. Both Tavis Smiley and Suzanne DePasse left BET because of the content that was being aired. Tavis Smiley could no longer be a part of the negative media BET portrayed. The same with Suzanne- both left. Note where Tavis works now? Note the content of his shows? What I regret is that he did not joing forces with the black political leaders and protest the same as they did in the 1950’s - the NAACP protested against such shows as Amos and Andy. They won. Amos and Andy was nowhere near as degrading as to what we have today. I am trying to do my part my writing my thesis (doctoral) on the subject matter and hopefully taking my concerns to a higher level. I am going to need help.

  26. gatamala wrote:

    Eric–you’ve hit it 100%.

    I noticed the downward slide from the time Viacom took control. It went from bad to obscene. During the mid-90s, the commercial success of hiphop led to more video shows for obviou$ reason$. However, there were shows w/ Ed Gordon, BET on Jazz, Tavis & Teen Summit. Even the videos played reflected various types of artists. BET UnCut, College Hill…thanks Viacom!!

  27. susie wrote:

    when ignorant low-life blacks stop blaming white people for
    all the ills of the world..there will be peace. I am sick
    of black people who shoot, rape and pillage everyone in sight somehow
    blaming white people as their excuse. I murdered my family cause the white man made me do it. I robbed the store cause the white man took all my money. There is a reason why you are the most feared an loathed minority
    in the world.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.