Online Pharmacy
Pain Killers
soma carisoprodol
Relaxer drugs
viagra online australia
Levitra Cialis Viagra
Cialis comparison levitra
cordarone online online detrol female viagra online order levitra au online cipro online nolvadex online toprol order aciphex online order rx online online rx store naprosyn online vasotec online Muscle Relaxant. Pain Relief. Drugstore protonix drug micardis drug brahmi drug adalat drug altace drug amaryl drug casodex drug celebrex drug cephalexin drug confido drug danasol drug effexor drug lasix drug citotec drug altace drug omnicef drug prozac drug flomax drug aciphex drug zelnorm drug mobic drug levaquin drug atacand drug coreg drug

Duke lacrosse team rape case reveals depth of racial stereotypes

CVK
duke lacrosse rapeI’ve been meaning to post about this for a long time now, but I needed some time to sit down and sort through all the information out there. I’m hoping that by now you’ve already heard about this story from other media outlets. Anyway, bear with me–this will be a long post.

Several white members of Duke University’s lacrosse team are accused of raping and sodomizing two black women and subjecting them to racist abuse. The way this case has been handled by mainstream media is really indicative of just how deep racial stereotypes run in this country.

Workers World has a great summary of the case, but I’m going to paraphrase the main points here:

On March 13, two African-American women were hired by members of the lacrosse team to perform as exotic dancers. The women were under the impression that they would be performing for a bachelor party of five men, but when they arrived, they encountered a drunken lacrosse team party with over 40 men present. As soon as they entered the house, they were subjected to racist and misogynistic slurs. The women were very frightened so they decided to leave. One member of the team, however, coaxed them into staying. What happened next, from Workers World:

Once she was inside, she was allegedly pulled into a bathroom by three men, where they subjected her to a brutally violent rape and beating. The victim says she was vaginally, anally, and orally penetrated, punched, kicked, and nearly strangled by the three men for about 30 minutes.

For nearly two weeks, not a single member of Duke University acknowledged this case. It wasn’t until March 28 that Duke’s President finally held a press conference. Moreover, all 47 of the lacrosse team’s members refused to talk to police.

Workers World does an excellent job of pointing out how the media and Duke’s administration are deliberately trying to obscure the blatant racism and misogyny of this case:

Many media outlets make a point of referring to the victim as a “stripper” or “exotic dancer,” while framing the allegations of racist verbal abuse as mere race “issues” or “tensions.” Many outlets dare ask if this case has anything to do with race at all, as if sexual violence can ever be separated from systemic oppression.

Gregory Kane at BlackAmericaWeb wonders if this crime is indicative of the fact that the lacrosse team members have bought into the stereotype of the oversexed black woman. I don’t know about that, but clearly members of the media have bought into it. Rush Limbaugh called the rape victim “a ho” during the March 31 broadcast of his national syndicated radio program. And this guy compares this case to the Tawana Brawley case in 1987, in which a 15-year-old black girl charged that six white men, some of them police officers, had raped her. The case was later thrown out for lack of evidence and Brawley’s boyfriend claimed she had made the whole thing up.

Rachel over at Rachel’s Tavern has a great post on the hypocrisies of the way crimes by white men are portrayed in the media versus those by black men:

One of the most troubling ways this is done is by the use of special terms coined in honor of Black men’s crimes or criminal involvement. The most famous example of this is the term “wilding.” The term wilding was used to describe the attack of a White woman in Central Park in the late 1980s… Another example of this is the whole “Stop Snitching” phenomenon, which has been labeled as a huge threat to the criminal justice system…

The trend of giving special labels to Black men’s bad behavior (or in some cases alleged bad behavior) makes it seem as if Black men invented gang rape or the code of silence that prevents snitchin. If the young wealthy White men can hide beyond their attorneys and say they are not “snitchin” on advice of counsel, the outcome is the similar—the crime is harder to solve. If a group of these White guys decide to have a party where they invite strippers and engage in wilding, the outcome is similar–another woman is sexually assaulted. Unfortunately, most people(especially White folks) in American culture don’t see these behaviors as similar. They think that one Black person’s bad behavior is somehow representative of all Black people, not the individual Black person or people involved. They think subconsciously or consciously that Black men are dangerous and White men are the innocent boys next door. So next time you hear a special lable for Black men’s bad behavior. Please think twice. 

Blackfeminism.org has a great post on this issue too, comparing the words used to describe the alleged perpetrators of the Central Park Jogger rape to the rapists in this Duke case:

the language used to describe the accused rapists in the Central Park Jogger case was still very dehumanizing. For weeks, we heard those kids referred to in animal terms: “a pack,” “preying,” or “preyed upon,” “predators,” “animals,” “savage” and the like. At least one paper called them (or compared them to) “wolves.”…

Now, I am not a fan of using animal language to describe people, but the obvious question is ’Why aren’t white offenders (and accused offenders) referred to in these same terms? Why in this Duke case, are we not hearing the media call the alleged attackers to as “animals,” or “a trio of dogs?” Why do we not hear the phrase “allegedly preyed upon” a woman? Is rape somehow less savage or animalistic when comitted by white lacrosse players?

The best place to keep up on the latest developments in this case is the blog Justice 4 Two Sisters. The site describes itself as ”a watchdog, information hub, and activism vehicle to ensure this young woman receives the justice she deserves. (It is our position both women were victims of a hate crime.)”

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Controversy.com on 19 Apr 2006 at 1:52 pm

    Duke lacrosse case’s feminist, racist, elitist aspects…

    In the waiting-time for more DNA results and a third suspect in the Duke lacrosse rape story, wirters are weighing in on things feminist, racist, and elitist. Tip o’ hat to BlogHer.org’s Erin Kotecki Vest for teeing up these…

  2. Mixed Media Watch - tracking media representations of mixed people on 24 Apr 2006 at 7:16 am

    […] MIXED MEDIA WATCH NEWS UPDATE Jen discusses three recent news items. The Duke Lacrosse team rape case reveals some interesting (racist) patterns in the ways in which the media describe crimes perpetuated by black people versus those perpetuated by whites. Hines Ward’s visit to South Korea prompts the government to make some serious changes in the way it treats mixed Koreans. For the first time ever, a mixed black/Chinese woman enters the Miss Chinatown pageant in Los Angeles and wins third place! Finally, we mourn (ahem) the conclusion of the show we love to hate, Black.White. […]

Comments

  1. Lyonside wrote:

    I was listening to NPR’s interview w/ Duke’s president this weekend (might have been Friday evening). Basically, this is the worst of the reported incidents (”reported” since some stats claim that 90% of sexual assault victims don’t persue prosecution either by choice or lack of “evidence”). But the lacrosse team and mens sports in general at Duke have a history of drunkenness, lewdness and other minor incidents. One of the lacrosse team is working w/ the police on this.

    The kicker, though, is that Duke has its own police force (the interview made it sound like it was real police, not security). Gee, wonder how biased they might be.

    Thing is, you DO have to assume innocence before guilt, and I’m willing to do so. I do think there’s a total double standard in how the media treats white vs. minority victims of assault. Exotic dancing/stripping is LEGAL. Unless that changes, then the women in the case must be treated the same as any assault victim from 18 to 80. Children victims usually warrant special attention by the media (as they should). But why should other victims of assult be any different?

    The best thing that these women could have done has been done: they went to the authorities.

  2. eric wrote:

    All I can say about this case is that most of the calls into radio stations here in Boston have been defending the white guys on the lacrosse team. Before the email came out where the dude was talking about killing them, cutting off their skin and “ejaculating” into this pants or whatever, most of the radio call in shows had the tone of (these were the actual talking points, I just can’t quote the actual words correctly :) )

    Caller:
    “I don’t think they’re guilty”
    Host:
    “why not?”
    Caller:
    “Well, think about it, how sadistic would you have to be to pull something like this off? 1 guy maybe, but never 2 or 3 guys… Remember that Tawana Brawley case?”

    Next Caller:
    “I don’t think they’re guilty”
    Host:
    ‘why not?”
    Caller:
    “Well, race relations between Duke and Durham,NC (predominately black area) have never been good, I bet she made this story up to get back at the rich white people at Duke!”

    Next Caller:
    “These girls are EXOTIC dancers? What did they think was going to go on at this place?”
    Host:
    “Well, didn’t things go a little too far?”
    Caller:
    “Come on, these girls know what goes on at these things”

    Thats all I can write about this topic.. This whole thing is getting to the point of absurdity. A white woman runs away from her bride, and shes the headline of hte nightly news for months, EVEN WHEN ITS DISCOVERED SHES OK she got more airtime then this story had.

    ugh. makes me sick.

  3. Meredith wrote:

    Innocent Until Proven Guilty is the American Way. Perhaps the guys are guilty, perhaps the girl is making up stories to get some money and attention… those new pictures don’t cast her in a good light.. not to mention her reputation and line of work… Time will tell…

  4. Lyonside wrote:

    But again, stripping and exotic dancing are LEGAL jobs. According to the rules, no sexual contact is allowed.

    And consent is consent. No consent is rape and should be treated accordingly.

    I wouldn’t trust any talk-radio for information - they deliberately choose the crazy callers to keep the sane people listening to the train-wreck.

    The thing is, I just want the police and the system to DO ITS JOB. Process the rape kit (god, I hope they did one), take the depositions, protect the victim(s)’ identity, protect the alleged assaulters too (you can’t prosecute dead people), and run it by a hopefully-balanced jury. And until that trial starts, the media should report it, do the background peices if it needs to, and then shut up about it. To keep rehashing and giving bad/unresearched information can take away all hope of a balanced jury.

    But this is unfortunately standard practice towards victims of rape (male or female, but usually female): make the victim guilty of SOMETHING (profession, attire, level of inebriation, location, race/ethnicity). What they’re doing to the (alleged) victims now is the reason why many rape victims never come forward to begin with.

  5. eric wrote:

    “Meredith :
    .
    Innocent Until Proven Guilty is the American Way. Perhaps the guys are guilty, perhaps the girl is making up stories to get some money and attention… those new pictures don’t cast her in a good light.. not to mention her reputation and line of work… Time will tell…

    Yes, you’re absolutely right. The media always protects and reports stories in a fair and balanced manner, respecting the rights of the accused in all cases. Now that I think about it I remember in the Kobe Bryant case when the media painted him as innoc… oh wait, I meant the OJ trial where he was initially found innocent and everyone left him…. no no, I mean that case out on teh carribean island, where that girl was abducted and they arrested those black guys immediatel…

    The point here is, the double standard of the media is undeniable. Why is it when Kobe Bryant is accused of rape, its an innocent white girl from Colorado, (I agree the web media had other things to say, but the major networks never touched the stuff), yet when its a black woman whos raped by a duke lacrosse team, the nature of the female is questionable? These kinds of double standards are too often seen to be ignored.

    Regarding ” those new pictures cast her in a bad light”, how about the email where the guy said he was going to kill them, cut off their skin, and ejaculate on himself? How about how the duke lacrosse coach has resigned?

    Lyonside,

    The thing is, I just want the police and the system to DO ITS JOB. Process the rape kit (god, I hope they did one), take the depositions, protect the victim(s)’ identity, protect the alleged assaulters too (you can’t prosecute dead people), and run it by a hopefully-balanced jury. And until that trial starts, the media should report it, do the background peices if it needs to, and then shut up about it. To keep rehashing and giving bad/unresearched information can take away all hope of a balanced jury.

    I agree here, but its not just enough that the police and media do their jobs, they need to do their jobs CONSISTENTLY for ALL races. This is the major issue here. I’m so angry right now I can’t remember which island that carribean deal went down on, but I saw more pictures of the innoncent black guys the initially arrested then the shady white guys who were eventually implicated. Why is it when Enron and Worldcom get brought up on charges, aside from Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling we rarely see the players involved in that fiasco, yet we get minute by minute converage of Martha Stewart for doing something 1/1000th as harmful compared to the aforementioned companies?

    Come on, can anyone here really say with a straight face that if some black members of a collegiate sports team allegedly gang-raped a white female it wouldn’t be hte leading story on every newscast?

  6. Lyonside wrote:

    Eric:

    You’re right, there is TONS of bias. So it begs the question - where is Jesse Jackson or any other self-appointed AA leader now? I missed my normal Sunday morning pundit viewing, so I don’t know if anyone was on FTN about this or whatever.

  7. honey-b wrote:

    I just heard the news about these photos allegedly taken before the alleged rape…all I have to say is that if it is true the dancer came to the party with scraped knees then how desperate where these college boys to actual get some kind of sexual gratification from watching an injured dancer perform. You would think they would have sent her packing. Oh the effects of alcohol!!

  8. eric wrote:

    “Eric:

    You’re right, there is TONS of bias. So it begs the question - where is Jesse Jackson or any other self-appointed AA leader now? I missed my normal Sunday morning pundit viewing, so I don’t know if anyone was on FTN about this or whatever.

    You’ll hear no complaints from me on that issue, I couldn’t agree more. Most of those guys are hucksters and charlatans as far as I’m concerned :)

  9. Merq wrote:

    I say screw Jackson/Sharpton/Farrakhan. I don’t see why we need “leaders” to look up to. But anyway, one thing you’re all forgetting to mention is that the suspects in the Central Park Jogger case were exonerated after DNA evidence confirmed a confession from a man already serving time.

  10. honey-b wrote:

    well now. According to Sport Issustared the DNA taken from the victim does not match the 46 lacrosse team members who prived DNA samples to police. Just what the hell is going on? If this woman did lie it is a terrible slap in the face to true rape victims.

  11. Lyonside wrote:

    Honey -

    Heard the same on NPR. Now, prosecutors are obligated to share stuff like DNA evidence w/ defense attorneys (see what watching L&O will get you), and yes, there wasn’t a DNA match.

    It’s possible this IS a false accusation, which really does damage all the real victims out there.

    It’s also possible that a victim was assaulted w/out ejaculation. Or that condoms were used. All the facts aren’t in yet. Remember that sperm can live up to 72 hrs, so whatever fluid they found, if it didn’t match, may have been from a consentual encounter. If any assault did happen after that, it didn’t have to leave DNA to still be an assault.

  12. LAX wrote:

    The recent lack of evidence and the DAs choice of venue for his most recent “Community” conference (the University the alleged victim attended) - I think shows that some in the Durham area were too soon to bring a cloud over the entire Duke University System!!
    If this does end up being another “Tawana Brawley” - which it could be: No DNA - on the girl or even in the house that matches up with a “gang rape”, Another unrelated 911 call from the other “stripper” that makes no mention of a rape, pictures from the party showing the alleged victim already bruised, and scratched up (and supposedly drunk) - WHERE do the kids on the lacrosse team go to get retribution for the pain and embarrassment that has been brought on them ? What about their “reputation” - their potential National Championship year now gone? Who is going to pay them back for their losses? If the victim ends up having fabricated the story - 46 kids - some obviously not perfect – but at least some others that have unfairly been branded “RAPISTS” for just being on the team -
    How eager was the media to want to jump on this case?? - does anyone remember from the first of this case the use of terms like “sense of entitlement” - “swagger” - “elitism” - “classism”- to describe these kids – remember these are 18 – 22 year old students at one of the most respected Universities in the country participating in one of the most respected Lacrosse programs in the country – not your typical recipe for a felon? Granted it is always a possibility – anything is a possibility.
    No matter how this ends up - at least 43 kids (46 - minus the three that MIGHT have assaulted the girl) have been incorrectly branded – maybe for life - and for no other reason than for media headlines. If anyone really wanted JUSTICE - they would have waited for the DNA before parading the entire team as a bunch of wolves.
    How is this even close to balancing the victim’s rights vs. allowing the accused to be treated as innocent until proven guilty??
    And to answer those that were wondering where Sharpton and Jackson have been - maybe “once bitten - twice shy” - remember that T. Brawley was one of the nation’s first introductions to Mr. Sharpton.

  13. K-Pow wrote:

    Yeah, I was just on MSNBC and apparently 75-85% of sexual assault cases did not have DNA evidence linking the perpetrator to the crime. Apparently it is not uncommon in rape cases for there to be no DNA evidence left on the victim. Also a second lab is now testing the evidence. Whether or not anything comes up…I guess we will have to wait and see.

    But Lax brought up a good point about the media’s rush to get this story to the airwaves before charges had been brought down. It makes me wonder if the media should take a wait-and-see approach before dissiminating information that serves to rile up peoples emotions. Rape is a serious charge. Mix race into it and you have one hot pot.

    I guess we will have to just “wait-and-see” what the DA does now. He seems to be pretty confident that a rape occured. Reagrdless of what happens, maybe this will cause college boys to think twice about inviting a stripper to their frat house. It would have been a lot safer for them to watch a porn flick or try to gain access into a strip club. Though I guess many of them would have needed fake ID’s for that.

  14. Lyonside wrote:

    LAX:

    I get your point about the media, but spare us the “only poor non-athletic uneducated people commit rape” scenario.

    The macho subculture of pro and almost-pro sports in the US ENCOURAGES at the very least aggression and not a little misogyny. Rapists come in every color, from every walk of life. Some attack strangers. A greater number attack those they know (i.e. date or acquaintence rape). However, it IS often the rich, priveleged ones who have mommy and daddy’s lawyer to get them out of a charge.

    What this case, regardless of the outcome, highlights is how colleges and universities allow bad behavior to go on in order to keep the alumni happy and keep their rep/high profile/pro sports recruiters happy. This is not the first problem that Duke has had w/ their lacrosse teams. Gemeral bad behavior is epidemic among US colleges and universities.

  15. LAX wrote:

    I in NO way meant to insinuate that white, athletic, rich kids couldn’t rape someone – unfortunately history speaks to the fact that those demographics are often found in the arrest records.

    The point I was attempting to make was a bit broader – that the kids on Duke’s Lacrosse team have academic, social and athletic backgrounds that most kids (and parents – which is a whole other topic of conversation) would kill for. The coach suspended players for grades falling below a B average. This is not to say they couldn’t commit a crime – far from it. It was more to point out that up to the day the Durham DA took that young lady’s statement these kids were – for the most part – good citizens – probably a step above most kids their age in terms of life accomplishments.

    Saints they were not - Yes – there is a history of underage drinking – Yes – there is a history of loud parties – Yes – as a father myself I worry that my son navigates that path in a more responsible way – BUT – they are kids – most under 20 – University is where you learn a lot of life’s lessons – one of the BIG lessons is when to follow friends and when to walk away from something dumb – and MAYBE in this case possibly criminal. And at this point the drinking and partying is the only thing they have any real proof occured.

    Was the line between - stupid (drinking and partying) and criminal (assault) crossed that night at the house in Durham –we may never really know – but the point is that these kids – regardless of the loud parties and the underage drinking – were not BAD kids. And yet, with the words of one young lady – they have been instantly demonized. That is not fair – not with what we knew then and not even with what we know now.
    If one or more of those boys assaulted that girl – in any way – they should be prosecuted to the ends of the land – but as a fair society we have to always be concerned with delivering justice in equal doses to all parties – prosecute the guilty and protect the innocent regardless of color, life style or economic situation - with equal strength – within the confines of that particular EVENT. We can’t bring all sorts of previous biases in. The attempts at denigrating the young lady by calling her a “stripper” or the portraits of the team as spoiled, rich kids protected by their wealthy parents and teams of attorneys – get us no closer to the truth – but are thrown around like confetti – and in the end – I would be willing to bet after this - everyone involved is worse off. Well except the media – who probably managed to sell some papers and some ad space.

  16. eric wrote:

    LAX:

    You are 100% correct, I think what you’re failing to realize is that the underlying problem is that the media does and more importantly the law does not act in the ways that you talk about. NOW that DNA evidence has surfaced that absolves the team, the story is headlining hte news, they have analysts on CNN / FOX NEWS / MSNBC talking about the case etc. 3 days after the alleged rape happened I was asking people about the case and they had never heard anything about it.

    I haven’t even really seen pictures of any of the team except the guy who wrote the email talking about “killing the girls, cutting off their skin and ejaculating on himself” (by the way, yes this does qualify someone as a “bad” kid :) )

    If it were a predominatly black group of kids on a college sports team that allegedly gang-raped a white stripper,

    a) It’d be headlining the news 15 minutes after the call to police happened
    b) We’d have seen pictures and bios of the entire team by now.
    c) If the DNA evidence absolved them, the story would disappear immediately,

    As far as the duke lacrosse team finding a way to get their reputations back (assuming they are innocent), I totally agree.

    Lastly, I couldn’t disagree more about thinking the statement “18 – 22 year old students at one of the most respected Universities in the country participating in one of the most respected Lacrosse programs in the country – not your typical recipe for a felon? Granted it is always a possibility – anything is a possibility.”

    I also went to one of those “most respected Universities in the country” and the most felonious activity I’ve ever seen in my life was perpetrated by 18-22 year old white males, the difference is

    a) they weren’t caught
    b) if they were caught, once they were apprehended, they were let go by police.

  17. Merq wrote:

    “but the point is that these kids – regardless of the loud parties and the underage drinking – were not BAD kids. And yet, with the words of one young lady – they have been instantly demonized.”

    What I find odd is that you’re willing to assume the rest of the population demonized by the media is made up of “BAD kids.” What you’re saying is, in essence, even if they did rape the girl, they were just good kids who made a mistake. Or am I wrong?

    This is a problem that plagues the American media, public, and (sadly) judicial system. Not to pimp my documentary, but I interviewed Pulitzer-winning journalist/best-selling author Karen Hunter, and she recognized this as a common trend in America. People see these offenders (and suspects like the Duke kids) as “good youngsters with a future,” while others like the black suspects in the Central Park Jogger case are convicted before they’re tried.

    Screw diplomacy here, LAX. I must ask you, do a high GPA and a presigious education preclude one from being “bad?” Why is this a concern here, and not in the case of the scores of black, less-affluent kids who aren’t given the benefit of the doubt in their cases. These kids are never “good kids who made mistakes.” Why is that?

    So, LAX, while I see your heart is in the right place, I have to ask that you question where your mind is– along with much of America’s. If you’re going to mourn the vilification of one group, try to remember the countless others yearning to hear a voice speaking out on their behalfs when their names are being dragged through the mud by the media.

  18. eric wrote:

    merq, whats up with your documentary? is there a website for it?

  19. honey-b wrote:

    good points Lyonside about why there might not be DNA evidence. According to a report given by the DA the victim was raped from behind which perhaps explains why no DNA evidence, as of today, was found underneath her fingernails. She also could have been assaulted by a broom or other object, though no info of this sort has been leaked to the press. The truth will come out soon enough. I hope this woman was not telling a lie becuase too many women ARE sexually assualted and the last thing we need is for people to question their credibility because of THIS woman’s actions (IF she did, in fact, lie).

  20. LAX wrote:

    We can discuss the scale of depravity involved in the underage drinking, the horrible emails and the strippers all day long and that may certainly make for a “bad” kid but I still think it’s a jump to assume these same kids can so easily move from this juvenile behavior to assault and rape. Someone, please tell me there is some sort of logic in at least taking a short time out – to say – before we ruin these 46 kid’s year and maybe their whole lives - we get some sort of real evidence against someone – anyone???

    If, we want to use a hypothetical, lets use the Duke Basketball team – comprised of smart, athletic, over-achievers that for the most part are African Americans. It would have been EVERY BIT as wrong to brand that whole team as rapists over the statement of one-person (not specifically) accusing three players. I would have been every bit (if not more) irate about that scenario. This has been botched even IF there are three guilty players on the team – You just don’t draw into question the integrity of an entire team of 46 INDIVIDUALS over the (possible) actions of a few members. What if this had been the Chess team or the Latin club? What type of demographics would we need to have where the media and the judicial system doesn’t carpet-bomb the entire group?

    I will gladly concede that being “bad” and being a felon are thankfully two very different things. I will NOT concede that being a drunk, white lacrosse player is synonymous with being a rapist any more than I would conceded that being an inner city black male is synonymous with being a drug dealer and neither should anyone else.

    I totally agree that historically less affluent, under served groups have gotten the shaft in terms of legal representation and justice and that should be an embarrassment to our legal system and our society as a whole. But, is the answer to correcting that historic injustice that more affluent citizens are held to some higher standard on innocence? That would certainly be an interesting strategy.

    And by the way - I think all kids are “good kids with a future” - some just have bigger problems to overcome than others.

  21. Merq wrote:

    Eric,

    Thanks for the interest. It’s a web-documentary, and you can visit simply by clicking my name. If you’re looking for the interview in question, take the following path:

    MEDIA > NEWS & PUBLISHING INDUSTRIES
    (will launch in a popup window)

  22. miester wrote:

    Who has a picture of this chick. Let me see it all this was worth it.

  23. jed wrote:

    if it were 3 black men and a white girl it would be different.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.