Michael Jackson’s kids fathered by sperm donors
CVK
Finally! Of course this comes as no surprise to most of us, but according to MSNBC, Michael Jackson’s ex has admitted to an Irish newspaper that Jackson is *not* the biological father of “his” extremely Caucasian-looking children:
The alleged comments come on the heels of a report in the New York Daily News that Jackson has been limiting Rowe’s access to their children.
Rowe couldn’t be reached for further comment and Jackson’s rep didn’t respond to repeated requests for comment.
The mother of two of Michael Jackson’s children has reportedly said that the babies were conceived from a test tube.
An Irish publication is quoting Debbie Rowe as saying that Prince Michael Jr., 8, and Paris, 7, were both conceived using semen from a sperm bank.
“Michael knows the truth — that he is not the natural father of Prince Michael Jr. and Paris,” Rowe said, according to the Irish newspaper Sunday World. “He has to come clean.”
Keya wrote:
DUH
Posted 01 Dec 2005 at 11:11 pm ¶
Ahah wrote:
Debbie Rowe has denied through her lawyer giving such an interview. Why would she make such a revelation to a small Irish tabloid anyway, it is worth millions !! Use your brain.
Posted 02 Dec 2005 at 3:27 am ¶
Ben wrote:
For a website so sensitive with regard to individuals of mixed ancestry, I’m surprised to see this article prefaced with “Of course this comes as no surprise to most of us…”. This is a tiny step from “of course they’re white, look at them!”, a sentiment I consider antithetical to the purpose of this and similar websites.
My (biological) father is black and my (biological) sister has blue eyes, fair skin, and straight, naturally blonde hair. In her youth, she too might have fallen under the category of “extremely Caucasian-looking children,” and it would have come as “no surprise” to anyone if she’d been revealed to have a different father. But she doesn’t. She just falls on an extreme end of the phenotypic spectrum for black/white mixed-race people.
As Ahah implies above, this could be a complete fabrication that’s passing for truth because it is so believable: first, because people will believe anything about Jacko, and second, because people assume they can (theoretically) tell a person’s race just by how they look, and they don’t trust realities that challenge that. Of all people, the mixed-race community should most strongly reject this second assumption.
Point is: they’re not biologically his. Fine. But our relative surprise at this revelation ought to have nothing to do with how the children look.
Posted 02 Dec 2005 at 11:00 am ¶
Danni wrote:
are you saying you think those white children are michael’s?
not unless all that surgery has been a subtle guise, and the little boy we knew in the ’70s (well not me, I was born in the 80’s) is gone?
Those children aren’t Michaels (biologically). The truth will soon come out.
Posted 02 Dec 2005 at 6:00 pm ¶
Mark wrote:
Probably cause Michael stopped paying her to keep quiet.
Posted 02 Dec 2005 at 6:05 pm ¶
dcmc wrote:
I can see one looking more “white”, but three? It just doesn’t make sense that all three of “his” babies all look “white”.
Posted 08 Dec 2005 at 3:26 am ¶
Hapa Meister wrote:
With a sissy voice like his, I had no doubt he was a homo from the get go.
Wake up people!!! HOMOS aren’t as uncommon as Christian conservatives like to think.
Posted 05 Jan 2006 at 5:51 am ¶